Showing posts with label assessment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label assessment. Show all posts

Sunday, November 29, 2015

Collection evaluation: a foundation for collection development

Bullard, Sherrie
Agee, J. (2005). Collection evaluation: A foundation for collection development. Collection Building, 24(3), 92-95. doi:10.1108/01604950510608267


Summary: Librarians have many strategies available for evaluating collections. This article describes three major approaches to collection evaluation: usercentered evaluation; physical assessment; and specific subject support. Each approach employs a variety of specialized evaluative techniques. The benefit of using any of these techniques is that a focus can be developed on any aspect – subject, age, quality, or use – of the collection. Evaluating the collection allows librarians to know what resources are already available, what may be needed, and whether future collection development can be filled most effectively with print or electronic resources. The results from these techniques give justification for investment of staff time and energy in evaluation projects.


Evaluation:  Without collection evaluations that provide a clear assessment of available resources, future collection management – budgeting, format consideration, selection, or deselection – may be inefficient and at risk. Librarians in large or small libraries can employ the collection evaluation methods in this article to gain meaningful information about their own holdings. Wise collection building is dependent on a foundation of current resource assessment. This article provides some tools to build such a foundation successfully.

Labels: Assessment, Collections management, Project evaluation, Information media, Resources

Thursday, October 8, 2015

50:50 by 2020

Zatko, Ruzena


Lodge, D. (2015). ‘50:50 by 2020’. Australian Library Journal, 64(3), 165-167.

doi:10.1080/00049670.2015.1041217




Summary:


In this article, Damien Lodge discusses patterns in the future of eBooks and eReaders. Lodge is currently a lecturer at Charles Strut University and previously served as President for Australian and Library Information Association (ALIA). Although the article is title 50/50 by 2020, the conclusion ends that the ratio of eBooks vs prints will most likely be 20:80.

The article is informative on statistics of eReaders from 2010 to present. The results show that from 2010 (when eReaders started to take off) the trend has since slowed down and the purchase of readers is becoming more stagnant. Lodge also mentions that major publishing companies are working with libraries in terms of receiving discounts with eBooks.


Evaluation:


            Lodge demonstrated some great points in the future of electronic readers and books, and whether libraries and us print enthusiasts should be concerned. The article covered the pros of eBooks that were mentioned, such as requiring less space, fewer staff, and the savings in budget. Also, an interesting observation is Lodge realizes that eBooks are turning into another format offered at libraries (such as hardcover, audio, etc.) instead of a replacement of print books. On that note, it would be interested to hear other librarians’ feelings about this and if they really care for the perk of less space and staff since this is jeopardizing job security.
           Overall, it does demonstrate that libraries in general are taking the next step to equip their library with eBook for their tech savvy patrons. What the article could have covered is approximately what percentage of libraries are frequently working with publishers and taking advantage of the offers. Also, if and what percentage of libraries still don’t offer eBooks for whatever reason.