Showing posts with label history. Show all posts
Showing posts with label history. Show all posts

Sunday, May 11, 2025

Add Value or Shift the Focus?: A Summary of Quantitative Analysis Meets Art History by Minseo Kim

Anguiano, Jennifer


Kim, M. (2022). New Method for Museum Archiving: “Quantitative Analysis Meets Art History.” Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, 15(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3531018


Summary:

Kim's New Method for Museum Archiving: “Quantitative Analysis Meets Art History” explores the intersection of data-driven methodologies and traditional art historical approaches in museum archiving. The study introduces quantitative analysis as a tool to enhance the classification, preservation, and accessibility of museum collections. By integrating computational techniques, such as image processing and visualization, the research aims to improve the efficiency of archival systems while maintaining the integrity of historical narratives.

The article highlights the challenges of conventional museum archiving, emphasizing the need for structured data frameworks to support curatorial decisions. Kim argues that quantitative analysis can complement art history, offering new perspectives on collection management and historical interpretation. This approach promotes a more innovative and adaptable archival system, ensuring that museums can effectively document and analyze their collections in the digital age.

Evaluation/Opinion:

As a scholar who has only received traditional art history teachings, the idea of mixing it with data-driven methods feels exciting yet nerve-wrecking. Usually, studying art is all about interpretation, symbolism, and cultural context, as opposed to crunching numbers and running algorithms. It almost feels like the number aspect of data, would take away the human, emotional response to understanding artworks. However, if there is a new way to increase the organization and accessibility of a collection, it might be in the best interest of art historians to adapt. If museum administrators can use data tools to track artworks, spot trends or preserve items better, that could help their staff do their jobs more efficiently. The question is will it add value to traditional art history or end up shifting the focus too much towards numbers.


Sunday, December 1, 2024

Review of Dangerous reading: How socially constructed narratives of childhood shape perspectives on book banning

Dangerous reading: How socially constructed narratives of childhood shape perspectives on book banning


Urruty, Nick


Tucker, T. (2024). Dangerous reading: How socially constructed narratives of childhood shape perspectives on book banning. Public Library Quarterly (New York, N.Y.), 43(2), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/01616846.2023.2232289


The article starts by discussing the current surge in book-banning. Tucker notes that this recent movement is driven by the political right, but notes that historically, calls to ban or censor books has not been a tactic associated with any one part of the political spectrum; some progressives have called for the removal or alteration of certain  classic works of literature due to racist, sexist, or otherwise objectionable content. The sorts of books that progressives and conservatives challenge are very different, but Tucker argues they have one critical trait in common- that children are passive and helpless readers who will internalize any message they come across uncritically. While it doesn’t always manifest in calls for book banning, the idea that children can be corrupted by indecent media is a fairly common one in current western society, but Tucker argues that these beliefs are not shaped by facts and evidence but by the current understanding of what children and childhood are, an understanding that has changed drastically and repeatedly over many centuries. 

The current understanding of children and their relationship to books originate from Enlightenment and Romantic-era writers, John Locke and Jean Jacque Rousseau in particular. Both argued that children were susceptible to being negatively influenced by the world and culture around them, and these ideas gradually worked their way into Western culture itself. Much later, Evangelical writers like Hannah More and Mary Martha Sherwood expressed concerns about what parts of literature children were understanding on a deeper level, leading to greater scrutiny over material intended for child readers. 

More modern studies have shown what a complex and multifaceted process a child’s learning from reading is, and studies have drawn a variety of different conclusions about different aspects. While the varied results are not consistent enough to be considered definitive, this research suggests that reading can have an effect, but often short-lived or unpredictable effects, and rather than imparting new perspectives on the child, reading often simply reinforces the child’s existing beliefs and understanding. 

Tucker also brings up how, regardless of what we may want, sexual, violent, and racially charged encounters are not unknown to many children in the world, particularly those from underprivileged backgrounds. Being able to see their own experiences, traumatic ones included, reflected in characters in books, can help young readers navigate their own situations. 


I really enjoyed this article. Most of the arguments against book banning have focused on the damage that can be done by restricting children's’ access to such information, or the legal implications of removing materials from public spaces that should be protected. This article was the first time I had ever seen an examination of where the impulse to ban and censor literature for children's’ sake comes from in the first place. Exploring how the current perception of children in the west is both relatively recent and largely the product of a handful of writers was a very effective way of helping the reader to understand why the entire concept of censorship as a means of protecting children is flawed. I also really appreciated the acknowledgement that, while the political right has been spearheading the recent spike in book-banning, the practice is not exclusive to any one part of the political spectrum, and that some progressives have also been guilty of trying to protect childhood innocence by making certain material unavailable.

Following that section with an examination of studies on the actual impact of reading on children’s perception was another smart choice, illustrating that yes, a practice based on a largely invented understanding of children is not going to have results that align with that understanding. Pointing out that these studies show that reading doesn’t make children more open-minded or ethical just as it doesn’t make them less so was another valuable insight, here- Tucker is challenging the entire narrative that children are easily influenced by books, not just the parts of that narrative that opponents of book bannings are likely to criticize.

Tucker ends the article with more familiar arguments about the negative impact book bannings can have on children who have no access to representation in literature. The previous sections give this one a great deal more weight, though, showing us how pointless the work that had such negative consequences really was.

The current massive push for book bannings is VERY politically charged, but I think Tucker is correct in framing the root of the problem as a politically neutral one. I’m not sure how well the argument that our understanding of childhood is an invention would play to a national audience, but the emphasis on studies showing the lack of impact reading has on a child’s biases and perceptions, one way or the other, does seem like an effective way to change minds and rally support against book banning without the need to lean on political factionalism.


Monday, September 12, 2016

"Library: An Unquiet History" by M. Battles

Fluetsch, Christopher

Battles, M. (2015). Library: An unquiet history. NewYork: W.W. Norton & Company.

Battle’s Library is a tremendous book about the history of libraries, both as physical locations and as philosophical ideas. The writing is clear, though sometimes Battles’ training as an academic writer comes through a little more than one might hope. The book is a wide ranging history, from some of the oldest collection of texts, like Sumerian cuneiform tablets, to modern digital libraries.
While the focus of the text is not specifically collection development, there are many implications for practice scattered throughout history. I found the section on medieval and Renaissance libraries to be especially compelling. It was at this time that the practice of library collection development became a profession, albeit a rare one. Italy of the 15th and 16th centuries had people who made their living out of providing libraries for rich patrons. The libraries of the day were as much about ostentatious displays of power and wealth as they were storehouses of knowledge.
The author also spends a number of pages on the fight within the British Library that occurred in the 17th and 18th centuries, between those who felt the collection should contain the great works of antiquity, placing much more emphasis on the importance of authority, versus those who thought the library should make an effort to seek out and acquire new books and modern research. The questions of how to use scarce resources and fill limited space is not a new one!
The author also deals with movements to restrict access to information and declare some form of knowledge “forbidden,” both in older days and today. Collection development always has to take into account community standards and expectations, and a fuller understanding of changes expectations over time can only help today’s library professionals better understand the world in which we work.
Sometimes, thinkers of the past would argue against libraries on the basis that book were no substitute for human interaction. This is reflected in today’s arguments about the use of information technology, especially among young people. Histories like Library help provide perspective on modern problems and discussions. Each generation seems to discover two things anew: sex and disapproval of the young.
This is not a book I would recommend for the general reading public, because of its highly specialized content. However, as a librarian, I found it fascinating and very much enjoyed learning about all the ways today’s library challenges mirror those from the past.

253 pages, including index. Softcover $8.19 on Amazon.

Monday, December 7, 2015

What to Collect? Building a local history reference collection at your library

Johnson, Stacey

 Marquis, Kathy & Waggener, Leslie (July 29, 2015). What To Collect?: Building a local history reference collection at your library. American Libraries Magazine.org. Retrieved from http://americanlibrariesmagazine.org/2015/07/29/what-to-collect/
    • This article covers how to create or expand your library's local history collection. It talks about what type of materials to add and what materials not to add. It also talks about a library policy covering these items and what you might want to have spelled out in that policy.
      • This is an excerpt from Local History Reference Collection for Public Libraries, by Kathy Marquis and Leslie Waggener (ALA Editions, 2015).
    • I found this article interesting as we have a decent size local history collection, but are always looking to expand it. The article lists different types of material that you might want to add to a collection and material types that might not work well in a library collection (but would work if you want to make an archive collection). It also talked about creating a policy for what materials will be collected and which won’t and how. I think the book would be very interesting to read.

    Saturday, December 5, 2015

    Building a Collaborative Digital Collection: A Necessary Evolution in Libraries

    Poster: Curtin, Shane

    Wu, M. M. (2011). Building a Collaborative Digital Collection: A Necessary Evolution in Libraries. Law Library Journal, 103(4), 527-551.

    Summary:

    This article discusses the importance of collaborative digital collections for law libraries, and how collection development is influenced by storage practices and budget. The author describes her vision for a library that can grant access to its users regardless of “time, space, and resources…” She discusses the millions spent on collection development by law libraries throughout the country, and how some states have dramatically reduced costs through collaborative collection development. If each library commits  a small sum to the creation of a shared database, she contends, each library would each get hundred of times more than their money’s worth in access.

    The explosion of legal resources and the constantly accelerating pace of the development and proliferation of laws no longer supports an institution by institution method of collection development: it is not an intelligence use of time or money. Each library, the author proposes, should focus its collection development on materials of local interest, while allowing the central branch of its consortium to obtain all of the general materials. Past attempts at consortium have failed because, according to the author, “local need… takes precedence over collective need” in the minds of most of the librarians invited to participate.
    Following this is  an in-depth discussion of copyright law and the problem librarians face when truing to digitize their materials. A law known as 17 USC 108 puts substantial limits on the duplication rights of libraries. So why “recreate the wheel” the author asks.  If private companies like Google are already embrarking on such massive digitization projects, can we not just utilize their efforts? Of course, but it would be a risk; Resources provided by private institutions have fluctuating conditions, and their future is at the whom of those who control them.
    The author concludes with a “call for collective action” to start building the law libraries of the future.

    Evaluation:

    All in all, this was a very interesting article. Law libraries are an interesting type of library to study, because the questions that dog standard reference collections (regarding the quick obsolescence of the resources) apply to the vast majority of things owned by law libraries.  While I support the goals of building a truly open access digital repository free from control by private entities like Google, I am a little skeptical of the feasibility of the project.  The sentiment is good —
     “If each library group committed to pre- serving a portion of the world’s existing, printed knowledge in cooperation with one another, they could reduce duplication of effort and ensure an unbiased preservation of materials. “ (p 545)
    but could libraries ever work together on such a vast scale? While we are all bonded by the ALA, collaboration at this level for a sustained period of time is a big thing to ask, especially with so many institutions already strapped in terms of resources, financing and manpower.
    Furthermore, digitization of law books is not even a good use of time- laws are always changing. Books on any one aspect of the law, like probate code, sometimes have several new editions or addendum’s per year, rendering the old versions instantly moot. While the evolution of laws is of historical importance and could be of use to scholars, most law library patrons are lawyers and in need of current information. If there any library materials that should be kept in digital format only, its those of law and science, which often become in obsolete even as the editor makes the final proof.  It seems prudent for law libraries to do away with hard copy versions of low-circ legal texts altogether, and subscribe instead to legal databases.

    The article raised an interesting point I had not considered- the extent that out viewpoint about history are influenced by contemporary materials- The author says of her proposed digital database-

    “Its creation would hopefully also allow libraries to prevent a great harm—the potential distortion of information. If users gravitate to online sources and only recent legal information is available online, then society’s perception of reality shifts to reflect only the information easily available. Part of our mission, therefore, should be to ensure that use of information is not determined solely by format, and the most effective way to achieve that goal is to place print and online documents on equal ground.”

    The effort is similar to the rift in history between the world before and after writing, or the creation of audiovisual materials. Even in the short term, our view of the past is warped by medium- like the quality of  old time radio broadcasts and black and white films amplify the differences between the past and the present which are in truth, quite minute. Medium influences perception of content, and makes many unduly prideful of their own era, entrenched in the contemporary zeitgeist.


    Thursday, December 3, 2015

    Holocaust Denial Literature Twenty Years Later: A Follow-up Investigation of Public Librarians' Attitudes Regarding Acquisition and Access

    Curtin, Shane

    Drobnicki, J. j. (2014). Holocaust Denial Literature Twenty Years Later: A Follow-up Investigation of Public Librarians' Attitudes Regarding Acquisition and Access. Judaica Librarianship, 1854-87.


    Summary:


    This meaty article analyzes the results of a 2012 survey given to public librarians regarding the acquisition of Holocaust-revisionism materials in their  libraries, and compares those results to an identical survey done in 1992 (when the issue first took the media by storm). It begins by defining Holocaust denial, then explores the current feeling among librarians regarding the collecting of controversial, historically inaccurate and generally afactual materials. It explores methods to address how to classify such materials in relation to historical sources on the Holocaust. Each survey question and the responses are graphed and analyzed, and the survey itself is included at the end of the article.  


    Evaluation:

    I find the fact that librarians are still discussing whether or not “offensive” things should be in the collection to be quite tragic. The things that end up in the library without a fuss and the things that cause major controversy are inconsistent. People take issue with the factual inaccuracy of Holocaust-revisionism literature, but there are plenty of other nonfactual texts occupying the nonfiction section of the library- there are books on alien abduction, books by popular mystics and television mediums who have since been discredited (as if there was ever any doubt), books on the most outlandish and outrageous conspiracy theories, and, for that matter, every religious text.
    Factual accuracy only becomes a concern for people when the issue is one that is politically charged, or involves ideas that are  considered taboo or offensive to the majority of people.  Some materials are always exempt from the burden of fact: "Accuracy” is never a consideration at all when it comes to materials of theological or philosophical nature, even though believers of each one claim them to be the ultimate truth. Why should historical texts be treated any differently? If history is written by the victors, as the saying goes, it is certain that there are countless unacknowledged lies to be found in the library. Consider how the status of Columbus (for one) has shifted from hero to Villain as more historical facts about his treatment of Native American have come to light. What about literature on the civil war that glosses over the atrocities committed by the north?
    A recent dispute occurred at my library when  a patron request was refused for a book denying climate change. The professional reviews of the book were not favorable, and it appears the author deliberately ignored or twisted existing facts to suit his agenda. We ended up NOT purchasing that book, but I think we should have. Or at least, I think we should have some materials in our collection that take that side of the debate.
    The facts speak for themselves, and no neutral inquirer of sound mind, when confronted with the facts, will choose to deny the occurrence of the Holocaust. And no one who isn’t of sound mind can be swayed anyway. Some wise librarians, quoted in the article, explained how critical thinking is fostered by the consideration of contrary views. Obviously.
    To get back to Holocaust denial- it is a phenomenon of cultural and historical significance, and should be acknowledged as such. Regardless of how we “feel” about such things, we must make them available, to some extent, in our libraries. This is not the 19th century- we are not here to mold peoples' minds. We are guides, human bridges to information, and that is all. When it comes to collections, our own morality has no rightful place.
    It is our duty (especially in a world where half the facts are probably wrong anyway) to represent all point of view. Since the body of literature on the Holocaust doubtlessly far exceeds the body of literature denying the holocaust, there is no danger, as one quote used in the article suggested, “that such fallacies may ultimately lead to the persecution and oppression of minorities once again”. That notion is the embodiment of ignorance. Evil cannot be suppressed by censoring ideas: in fact, the censorship of ideas IS the greatest evil.
    Frankly I’m a appalled by the level of censorship supporters I see amongst a profession whose members are supposed to the guardians of intellectual freedom. I is unethical (and immoral) for librarians to deny Holocaust-denail a place in their stacks.

    Wednesday, December 2, 2015

    Recordkeeping in Book Form: The Legacy of American Colonial Recordkeeping

    Zatko, Ruzena


    Zhang, J. (2014). Recordkeeping in Book Form: The Legacy of American Colonial Recordkeeping. Information & Culture, 49(4), 469-491.
     
    Summary
     
    In this study, what is being looked at is the history of recordkeeping, preservation, and retrieval systems. The inspiration to coding actually came from the Native Americans, who wore different color beads and each of them had a different meaning. Some of the bead collecting was to help them remember and to categorize. The colonial times did not have a recordkeeping system adopted yet and there is a lack of evidence on what their process was. But to get to the root of how recordkeeping formed, four samples were taken dating back to the 1600s and the practices were analyzed.
     
    Evaluation
     
    Due to this being a historic research, there is only the evidence that was preserved that can be used to support any claims with the origins of research. This also demonstrates because of improper recordkeeping practices or lack there of, we don't have the information we could have possibly had if those practices were in play. Clearly, everything must start somewhere. In this case dating back to the 1600s is impressive enough. Overall, this is a great paper, highly informative of the history of record keeping and its legacy.

    Tuesday, November 10, 2015

    A Century of Change



     Lamb, A. (2015). A century of change. Knowledge Quest, 43(4), 62-70.

    I recently read a great article by Annette Lamb entitled A Century of Change. In it, Lamb (2015) takes us through the last 100 years of school libraries from 1915-2015! She starts with an introduction about an article which ran in the September 1915 issue of Library Journal called "the best-equipped and most up-to-date high school library to be found anywhere in the country." The article referenced the library at the Girls' High School in Brooklyn. By today's standards, their lantern sliders and Victrola records would look like something in museum, but at the time, it made their collection stand out! At the time, they were one of the few libraries whose offerings went beyond print books to give patrons more options in accessing other types of materials.

    Lamb (2015) notes that “the past century has seen tremendous changes in school library resources. However, the mission of school libraries has remained the same (p. 63).” She adds that school libraries have sought to both meet the needs of students while also fostering a lifelong love of reading. The article goes on to offer a mini library history lesson and highlight the changes in the following areas: instructional resources, books, information collections, visuals, audio/video, computers and access.

    Instructional Resources
    The article points out that school libraries were becoming more widespread in the early 1900’s because of a shift in teaching instruction. Schools were starting to be “viewed as laboratories where students used books and visual resources for information exploration, small-group discussion, and project-based learning (Lamb, 2015, p. 63).” This is a lot like instruction today, only the libraries have expanded upon available resources for instruction.

    Books
    The author notes that around 1915, children would read Shakespeare in printed books, while today, a century later, a software app called Shakespeare in Bits allows students to learn Shakespeare through high-quality animation. This is just one of the many examples she provides to illustrate how printed materials have changed in libraries over the years. “The evolution of the book from text on paper to multimedia digital formats occurred gradually as each new technology added a new dimension to the classic form (Lamb, 2015, p. 63).” Lamb (2015) points out that print was combined with other media as far back as the 1910, when students would listen to poetry on phonograph records. In the 1970’s books on cassettes became popular, only to be quickly replaced by books on CD in the 1980’s and 1990’s and digital downloads in the 2000’s. In the past few years, we’ve seen the rise of e-books and graphic novels geared specifically toward young adults have become very popular.

    Information Collections
    The article discusses how, since 1915, librarians have spent a lot of time and energy organizing materials for vertical files. In the 1920’s and 1930’s, libraries began converting newspapers, books and manuscripts to microfilm. Thirty years later, libraries had microform readers available to patrons. Today, many reference materials are available online with subscriptions.

    Visuals
    In the article, a librarian from 1923 notes that she provides her students with visuals of maps, plants, insects and animal life on the bulletin board. Today, librarians are able to access a world of visuals with the internet. Lamb (2015) notes that “a quick search of the Web would provide students with access to millions of visuals including easy-to-access digital collections (p. 64).” She goes on to provide a brief history of visuals in library settings including the 1920’s use of photographs, slides and filmstrips, the 1940’s use of charts, graphs, maps and cartoons and the recent use of infographics and data visualizations.

    Audio/Video
    The article gives a quick overview of the changes in audio options from the Victrola to podcasts. It highlights that in the 1920’s and 1930’s instructional radio was briefly used in some schools while in the 1960’s and 1970’s audio tutorials were placed in library study areas. Today, audio is used in, for example, language programs such as Rosetta Stone and Mango, which libraries use for patrons to explore and learn other languages. As far a video, the 1910’s saw the use of low-cost portable projectors in schools. In fact, Thomas Edison once said “books will soon be obsolete in the public schools” (Lamb, 2015, p. 67). Imagine that! From the 1960’s through the present day, video is still widely used in instruction through the use of videotapes, laserdiscs, CDs and DVDs. Modern streaming services make it even easier for libraries to access and share the videos they seek, be it small clips or full-length programs.

    Computers
    One fact I was unaware of, was that “computer-assisted instruction emerged in the 1960’s” (Lamb, 2015, p. 68) and later, microcomputers of the late 1970’s and 1980’s. Today, as we know, computers are in nearly all schools and/or libraries and are used frequently for instruction. Software programs and social media are getting incorporated into daily curriculum as technology continues to grow and change.

    Access
    But as Lamb (2015) notes, “it’s not just the resources, but how we gain access to the information that has changed (p. 68).” As we see from the details above, the resources certainly have changed, but as librarians, our need to provide quick access to information has remained the same. Today, we have Google and other search engines which put multitudes of information at our fingertips. When I was growing up, I used the school library’s card catalog. It is interesting to note that, “in 1916, only 16.5% of school libraries in the South had card catalogs (Lamb, 2015, p. 69).” The card catalog became automated in the 1980’s with the use of microcomputers, and today, the physical card catalog of old is basically gone and in its place, online searching and databases. Technology and other inventions have sought to make information access easier and faster for school libraries and other kinds of libraries as well.

    Lamb concludes by noting that, although school libraries have existed since the 8th century, it took us until the 20th century to view them as a “source of enrichment for the curriculum (p. 70).” She adds that “while the formats available and tools for accessing information have changed, the school library’s focus on providing access to quality content and designing engaging learning environments remains the same (p. 70).” As an educator, I was very interested in this article. It really got me thinking not only about where we’ve been in the history of school libraries and their collections, but also where we’re going. What will an article such as this one say about US in the future? Will our libraries seem as archaic as the ones from 1915 do to us now? What changes will come about? How will collection development develop and how will be better serve students in the next century to come? All interesting points to ponder.