Diversity Assessment in Academic Libraries

Author: de Santiago-Stewart, Brenda

Citation:

Ciszek, M. P., & Young, C. L. (2010). Diversity collection assessment in large academic libraries. Collection Building, 29(4), 154–161.

Summary:

This article outlines different strategies for assessing diversity within academic library collections. Ciszek and Young describe quantitative tools (like WorldCat collection analysis, circulation data, subject breakdowns) and qualitative approaches (focus groups, user feedback, faculty conversations) to identify gaps in representation. They argue that without a clear, actionable definition of “diversity,” collection assessments can feel inconsistent or performative, leaving major blind spots untouched.

Reflection / Relevance to Collection Management:

This is a helpful reminder that “diversity” in a Collection Map can’t just be a value statement — it has to translate into measurable decisions. For RISD’s Fleet Library, where subjects span art, design, identity, and cultural production, assessing diversity should include both who is represented and which materials, formats, and voices are missing. It also makes me think about how my own CM proposals could incorporate more systematic assessment tools instead of assuming I “know” where the gaps are. Diversity assessment isn’t a one-time audit — it’s a continual, proactive process.