Subject-Specific Policy Statements: A Rationale and Framework for Collection Development.

McGuigan, G. S., & White, G. W. (2003). Subject-Specific Policy Statements: A Rationale and Framework for Collection Development. Acquisitions Librarian, 15(30), 15. https://doi-org.libaccess.sjlibrary.org/10.1300/J101v15n30_03

Summary:

McGuigan and White argue that traditional, library-wide collection development policies are often too broad to meet the nuanced needs of specialized subject areas. They present subject-specific policy statements as a more effective alternative, enabling libraries to articulate clearer goals, define collection boundaries, and communicate the distinctive characteristics of individual subject collections. The authors emphasize that creating detailed subject-based policies supports librarians in managing resources more effectively and helps patrons better understand what to expect from particular collections.

Evaluation: 

The passage presents a clear and well-reasoned argument for the value of subject-specific collection development policies within libraries. It effectively contrasts traditional, library-wide policies, which are characterized as overly broad and insufficient for addressing nuanced disciplinary needs with more detailed subject-based policies that offer clarity and precision. By emphasizing the benefits of subject-specific approaches, such as improved communication of collection goals, enhanced support for librarians, and better guidance for patrons with specialized research needs, the text highlights the practical advantages of tailoring policies to particular subject areas.

A notable strength of the passage is its articulation of how subject-based policies function not only as guiding documents but also as strategic tools. The discussion underscores that developing these policies requires close analysis of the current collection, an understanding of user needs, and forward-looking planning, activities essential to maintaining a relevant and robust collection. The reference to McGuigan and White strengthens the argument by grounding it in professional discourse and demonstrating that concerns about overly general policies are recognized within the field.